Obama Disappoints with Leonhart Nominee. Drug Warrior for hire.

Change you cannot really believe in. While the USDOJ memo released in October of 2009 seemed to signal a sea change in medical cannabis enforcement, the continued support for the very person whom the memo was meant to control is disheartening. Change is more than a memo.

The Forgotten Ban: Obama sticks with DEA nominee Michele Leonhart despite criticism of raids

By Mike Riggs – The Daily Caller

For a while, it looked like progressives and small government types might never stop warring over the passage of the Democrats’ health care bill earlier this year. But it seems a few members of each team — FireDogLake, the 10th Amendment Center, and a slew of marijuana activists – have finally found common cause in calling for President Obama to rescind the nomination of Michele Leonhart to head the Drug Enforcement Agency.

CW: BOO. HISSS…

In a letter released late last month, the groups accused Leonhart, a deputy administrator appointed by President George W. Bush and the acting administrator since the resignation of Karen P. Tandy in 2007, of ignoring a Justice Department directive not to “waste resources” by raiding dispensaries and growers operating legally in states that allow the sale of medical marijuana.

But according to a senior White House official, not even the combined grassroot powers of FireDogLake’s Jane Hamsher, a leading voice in the progressive community and a supporter of the single-payer health care plan abandoned by congressional Democrats earlier this year, and the 10th Amendment Center, which has provided guidelines to states that wish to repeal Obamacare, can derail Leonhart’s nomination.

CW: The anonymous “White House official” (I am looking at you Nick Shapiro) basically says that no matter what the people elected Obama think, he is going to continue to promote the failed policies and support the GW Bush policies that endangered so many in our community. Thanks, dick.

Obama is confident that Leonhart is the right choice, the White House staffer said, and that as of Friday the president wasn’t considering anyone else for the position. In other words, the response from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. to a chorus of concerns boils down to: Leonhart or bust.

CW: BUST!!!!!

In response to this message, critics have pointed out that Obama is shifting his stance on marijuana policy.

“It’s unfortunate — and outright baffling — that the Obama administration would choose someone for this post whose resume is so strongly at odds with the ‘new direction’ this administration had promised for drug policy in general and medical marijuana in particular,” the Marijuana Policy Project’s Mike Meno told The Daily Caller. “During the election campaign, and again through the Department of Justice memo in October, President Obama vowed to stop the outrageous Bush-era practice of raiding and prosecuting medical marijuana patients and providers who operate under state law. If change is what they seek, why would the administration nominate a Bush holdover under whom the DEA continues to raid the private property of citizens obeying state law? It makes no sense.”

CW: For the record, when I went to the DEA offices in Oakland to get my shit back in the summer of ’09 they had a bootlegged picture hanging where so proudly the faces of Bush and Tandy had hung before. It was an embarrassment. They did not even bother to patch the holes around the picture, so it looked like someone had been shooting at it. These people have no respect for the Commander in Chief (if that is your real name.)

MPP and other marijuana activists have pointed to a series of raids the DEA conducted in California as recently as last month as evidence that Leonhart is continuing the Bush-era strategy of cracking down on medical marijuana dispensaries and growers, even if they are operating legally under California law. They say this conflicts directly with statements Obama made on the campaign trail, such as this one from April 2008:

“When it comes to medical marijuana, I have a practical view more than anything. My attitude is that if it’s an issue of doctors prescribing medical marijuana as a treatment for glaucoma or a cancer treatment, there really is no difference between that and a doctor prescribing morphine, or anything else.”

But the White House and the Justice Department both told TheDC that Holder’s memo does not give dispensaries carte blanche to grow or sell marijuana, and that recent raids don’t conflict with what Obama expressed while campaigning.

“I wouldn’t say the memo ‘discourages’ certain raids,” a DOJ offical told TheDC. Rather, “it talks about prioritizing resources most efficiently.” And both the White House and the DOJ argued that the gist of the Holder memo was that the DEA would “not focus its limited resources on individual patients with cancer or other serious diseases.”

CW: Another “Official.” Go fuck yourself anonymous official. Yeah, yeah. Your fancy memo states “clear and unambiguous compliance with State law,” which doesn’t exist. Thanks for nothing, dick. So, what you are saying is the memo is not worth the paper it was printed on. We knew this, but society at large still believes the memo protects patient rights, so at least there is that. You guys suck.

Critics see the distinction between cancer patients who take medical marijuana and the people who sell them medical marijuana as hair-splitting.

“Attorney General Eric Holder was crystal clear last year when he directed officials within his department not to waste federal resources interfering with state medical marijuana laws,” wrote FireDogLake’s Jane Hamsher in the open letter distributed by the Marijuana Policy Project. “Yet throughout the tenure of President Obama’s administration, the DEA’s raids have continued in a manner wholly inconsistent with the spirit of that directive. What part of ‘not a priority’ does Michele Leonhart not understand?”

CW: Crystal clear? I do not know about that, but he did say he was going to back up off of us and let a player play. But in the end, the Government is filled with liars and thieves anyway, so fool me once…

Even the Tea Party-friendly 10th Amendment Center is willing to share the peace pipe with Hamsher and the FireDogLake community if it means stopping Leonhart’s confirmation. “We absolutely can come together on this issue,” said the center’s Michael Boldin, while adding that “Leonhart’s nomination should be moot,” because “constitutionally, her whole position should be abolished.”

CW: No shit. Let’s abolish the waste of money and get rid of the whole DEA. These folks would be better served going after real criminals, say in a nice Homeland Security position making sure our ports and borders are secured. Get a real job, or at least find some real drugs to bust. Can’t remember the last time I heard about a big DEA crack bust here locally. When they raided me they had to drive through some of the most crack infested streets in the world to get to my facility. Way to go.

What the alliance needs but likely won’t receive is political support from Congress. Not even House Speaker Nancy Pelosi–who has voiced her support for medical marijuana but not Proposition 19, the referendum item that would legalize cannabis sales in California–has offered a symbolic objection to Leonhart’s nomination, which the Senate Judiciary Committee could take up later this year.

CW: Thanks, Pelosi. Another symbolic gesture is just what those of us under attack really needed.

Not that it would do any good.

Ultimately, says syndicated columnist Jacob Sullum, “it was Obama who picked her instead of someone with different priorities, and he and his attorney general are letting her continue to violate his campaign pledge.”

CW: The fact is Obama needs to quit playing politics with the lives of patients and hire someone for the job that has morals and ethics that would tell them that busting people for cannabis was just a stupid and wasteful thing to do. How ’bout that?

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2010/08/18/the-forgotten-ban-obama-stands-by-dea-nominee-michele-leonhart-despite-outcry-from-progressives/print/#ixzz0x3zG6h5E

Comments are closed.